Small cell lung cancer · 15 regimens
Cost vs Efficacy · 7 points
| Regimen | Biomarker | Cost/cycle ↓ | Cycle | PFS ↕ | OS ↕ | Est. cycles | Course cost ↕ | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Epirubicin and Ifosfamide Variant #03 | — | R 27 949 | 21d | — | — | ~7 | ~R 195 643 indirect | — |
Topotecan monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 18 138 | 21d | 2.7 mo | 8.3 mo | 11 | R 199 522 PFS proxy | 8 |
Ifosfamide and Paclitaxel Variant #01 | — | R 9 725 | 21d | — | ~21.3 mo | ~10 | ~R 97 251 PFS proxy · indirect | 2 |
Ifosfamide monotherapy Variant #05 | — | R 8 704 | 21d | ~4.0 mo | ~8.4 mo | ~8 | ~R 69 635 PFS proxy · indirect | 2 |
Temozolomide monotherapy Variant #02 | — | R 7 358 | 14d | ~4.0 mo | ~16.3 mo | ~26 | ~R 129 994 PFS proxy · indirect | 10 |
Bendamustine monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 7 084 | — | ~16.5 mo | — | ~6 | ~R 42 504 PFS proxy · indirect | 2 |
Docetaxel monotherapy Variant #02 | — | R 2 921 | 28d | ~3.2 mo | ~9.8 mo | ~7 | ~R 20 450 PFS proxy · indirect | 52 |
Irinotecan monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 2 716 | 42d | — | 7.0 mo | 11 | R 29 874 PFS proxy | — |
Cisplatin and Etoposide (EP) Variant #22 | — | R 1 819 | 21d | ~5.0 mo | ~10.2 mo | ~4 | ~R 7 277 PFS proxy · indirect | 10 |
Gemcitabine monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 1 672 | 21d | ~3.8 mo | ~6.6 mo | ~7 | ~R 11 705 PFS proxy · indirect | 7 |
Etoposide monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 1 231 | 28d | — | — | ~6 | ~R 7 386 indirect | — |
CAV Variant #06 | — | R 865 | 21d | — | 7.6 mo | 6 | R 5 188 PFS proxy | 1 |
Paclitaxel monotherapy Variant #02 | — | R 734 | 28d | — | ~6.8 mo | ~7 | ~R 5 141 PFS proxy · indirect | 2 |
Vinorelbine monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 458 | 21d | — | ~6.3 mo | ~12 | ~R 5 490 PFS proxy · indirect | 4 |
Tarlatamab monotherapy Variant #01 Partial | — | — | 14d | — | 13.6 mo | 2 | — | — |
15 of 15 regimens shown