Renal cell carcinoma · 6 regimens
Cost vs Efficacy · 6 points
| Regimen | Biomarker | Cost/cycle ↓ | Cycle | PFS ↕ | OS ↕ | Est. cycles | Course cost ↕ | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Regorafenib monotherapy Variant #06 | — | R 307 423 | 28d | ~3.6 mo | ~9.4 mo | ~4 | ~R 1 229 690 PFS proxy · indirect | 15 |
Lenvatinib and Pembrolizumab Variant #01 | — | R 128 546 | 21d | ~23.9 mo | — | ~35 | ~R 4 499 104 PFS proxy · indirect | 3 |
Bevacizumab monotherapy Variant #08 | — | R 57 246 | 21d | ~8.5 mo | — | ~13 | ~R 744 203 PFS proxy · indirect | 1 |
Erlotinib and Bevacizumab Variant #01 | — | R 52 071 | 28d | ~9.9 mo | — | ~11 | ~R 572 783 PFS proxy · indirect | 1 |
Everolimus and Lenvatinib Variant #01 | — | R 48 788 | 21d | ~14.7 mo | — | ~22 | ~R 1 073 328 PFS proxy · indirect | 4 |
Bevacizumab and Interferon alfa-2a Variant #01 | — | R 19 082 | 14d | ~9.8 mo | ~20.8 mo | ~22 | ~R 419 807 PFS proxy · indirect | 4 |
6 of 6 regimens shown