Renal cell carcinoma · 6 regimens
Cost vs Efficacy · 6 points
| Regimen | Biomarker | Cost/cycle ↓ | Cycle | PFS ↕ | OS ↕ | Est. cycles | Course cost ↕ | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Regorafenib monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 132 655 | 28d | ~3.6 mo | ~9.4 mo | ~2 | ~R 265 310 PFS proxy · indirect | 15 |
Lenvatinib and Pembrolizumab Variant #01 | — | R 128 546 | 21d | ~23.9 mo | — | ~36 | ~R 4 545 663 PFS proxy · indirect | 3 |
Everolimus and Lenvatinib Variant #01 | — | R 48 788 | 21d | ~14.7 mo | — | ~2 | ~R 97 575 PFS proxy · indirect | 4 |
Erlotinib and Bevacizumab Variant #01 | — | R 26 036 | 28d | ~9.9 mo | — | ~52 | ~R 1 353 852 PFS proxy · indirect | 1 |
Bevacizumab monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 19 082 | 14d | ~8.5 mo | — | ~2 | ~R 38 164 PFS proxy · indirect | 1 |
Bevacizumab and Interferon alfa-2a Variant #01 Partial | — | R 19 082 | 14d | ~9.8 mo | ~20.8 mo | ~27 | ~R 515 218 PFS proxy · indirect | 4 |
6 of 6 regimens shown