Cost vs Efficacy · 2 points
| Regimen | Biomarker | Cost/cycle ↓ | Cycle | PFS ↕ | OS ↕ | Est. cycles | Course cost ↕ | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CapeOx, Cetuximab, RT Variant #01 | — | R 125 772 | 35d | — | — | — | — | — |
Capecitabine, Sorafenib, RT Variant #01 | — | R 15 253 | 35d | — | — | — | — | — |
Capecitabine and RT Variant #07 | — | R 4 675 | 38d | — | — | — | — | 1 |
FOLFIRINOX Variant #03 | — | R 3 740 | 14d | — | ~11.7 mo | — | — | 3 |
CapIriRT Variant #01 | — | R 3 185 | 35d | — | — | — | — | — |
Fluorouracil and RT Variant #08 | — | R 3 059 | 77d | — | — | — | — | 2 |
FUOX and RT Variant #01 | — | R 2 843 | 38d | — | — | — | — | 1 |
mFOLFOX6 Variant #02 | — | R 2 466 | 14d | ~8.4 mo | ~12.7 mo | ~19 | ~R 46 863 PFS proxy · indirect | 15 |
CapeOx, Camrelizumab, SCRT Variant #01 Partial | — | R 2 384 | 21d | — | — | — | — | — |
CapeOx Variant #01 | — | R 2 384 | 21d | ~6.7 mo | ~12.2 mo | ~10 | ~R 23 842 PFS proxy · indirect | 20 |
mFOLFOX6 and RT Variant #01 | — | R 2 256 | 14d | — | — | — | — | — |
FULV and RT Variant #07 | — | R 1 616 | 70d | — | — | — | — | 2 |
No neoadjuvant therapy Partial | — | — | — | — | ~19.2 mo | — | — | 8 |
Radiation therapy N/A - radiation Partial | — | — | 49d | — | ~9.2 mo | — | — | 1 |
14 of 14 regimens shown