Ovarian cancer · 14 regimens
Cost vs Efficacy · 10 points
| Regimen | Biomarker | Cost/cycle ↓ | Cycle | PFS ↕ | OS ↕ | Est. cycles | Course cost ↕ | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Carboplatin, Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, Bevacizumab Variant #01 | — | R 81 488 | 28d | 11.8 mo | — | 6 | R 368 985 PFS proxy | 3 |
Carboplatin and Paclitaxel (CP) and Olaparib Variant #01 | — | R 75 702 | 21d | 12.2 mo | — | 6 | R 217 317 PFS proxy | 1 |
Carboplatin and Paclitaxel (CP) and Bevacizumab Variant #01 | — | R 48 987 | 28d | 11.6 mo | 42.2 mo | 12 | R 473 840 PFS proxy | 3 |
Carboplatin and Gemcitabine (GCb) and Bevacizumab Variant #01 | — | R 34 401 | 21d | 11.7 mo | 33.6 mo | 6 | R 206 404 PFS proxy | 5 |
nab-Paclitaxel monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 16 043 | 28d | ~5.5 mo | ~11.5 mo | ~2 | ~R 32 087 PFS proxy · indirect | 2 |
Carboplatin and Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin Variant #03 | — | R 13 338 | 28d | 10.1 mo | 21.4 mo | 6 | R 80 026 PFS proxy | 4 |
Carboplatin and Docetaxel (DCb) Variant #06 | — | R 5 501 | 21d | ~4.7 mo | ~22.3 mo | ~6 | ~R 33 004 PFS proxy · indirect | 4 |
Carboplatin and Gemcitabine (GCb) Variant #01 | — | R 4 414 | 21d | 8.7 mo | 32.9 mo | 2 | R 8 829 PFS proxy | 5 |
Cisplatin and Gemcitabine (GC) Variant #01 | — | R 3 933 | 21d | — | ~10.3 mo | ~6 | ~R 23 595 PFS proxy · indirect | 1 |
Cisplatin and Paclitaxel (TP) Variant #02 | — | R 1 315 | 21d | — | 29.0 mo | 7 | R 9 204 PFS proxy | 1 |
Etoposide monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 1 231 | 28d | — | — | ~6 | ~R 7 386 indirect | — |
Carboplatin and Paclitaxel (CP) Variant #02 | — | R 1 025 | 21d | 9.6 mo | 29.0 mo | 12 | R 12 296 PFS proxy | 8 |
Carboplatin monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 535 | 21d | 5.8 mo | 21.0 mo | 2 | R 1 070 PFS proxy | 2 |
Rucaparib monotherapy Variant #01 Partial | — | — | 28d | ~20.2 mo | ~27.7 mo | ~2 | — | 7 |
14 of 14 regimens shown