Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma · 25 regimens
Cost vs Efficacy · 6 points
| Regimen | Biomarker | Cost/cycle ↓ | Cycle | PFS ↕ | OS ↕ | Est. cycles | Course cost ↕ | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
mFOLFOX6 and Pembrolizumab Variant #01 | — | R 172 058 | 42d | — | — | ~18 | ~R 2 967 706 indirect | — |
Cisplatin and Paclitaxel (TP) and Pembrolizumab Variant #01 | — | R 83 588 | 21d | — | ~26.4 mo | ~35 | ~R 2 879 160 PFS proxy · indirect | 2 |
Cisplatin and Fluorouracil (CF) and Pembrolizumab Variant #01 | — | R 83 223 | 21d | — | ~12.5 mo | ~35 | ~R 2 876 965 PFS proxy · indirect | 4 |
Cisplatin and Fluorouracil (CF) and Cetuximab Variant #03 | — | R 78 877 | 29d | ~5.5 mo | ~10.9 mo | ~6 | ~R 260 671 PFS proxy · indirect | 5 |
Ipilimumab and Nivolumab Variant #01 Partial | — | R 78 615 | 42d | — | 12.7 mo | 9 | R 707 538 PFS proxy | 1 |
Cisplatin and Docetaxel (DC) Variant #05 | — | R 3 185 | 21d | ~24.0 mo | — | ~3 | ~R 9 556 PFS proxy · indirect | 1 |
Cisplatin and Paclitaxel (TP) and Sintilimab Variant #01 Partial | — | R 3 055 | 28d | — | 17.2 mo | 26 | R 10 490 PFS proxy | 1 |
Oxaliplatin, Paclitaxel, Tislelizumab Variant #01 Partial | — | R 2 888 | 21d | — | 17.2 mo | 2 | R 5 777 PFS proxy | — |
Oxaliplatin and Paclitaxel Variant #01 | — | R 2 888 | 21d | — | 10.6 mo | 2 | R 5 777 PFS proxy | — |
CapeOx Variant #01 | — | R 2 620 | 21d | — | 10.6 mo | 2 | R 5 240 PFS proxy | — |
Fluorouracil and Oxaliplatin (FUOX) and Tislelizumab Variant #01 Partial | — | R 2 188 | 21d | — | 17.2 mo | 2 | R 4 376 PFS proxy | — |
Cisplatin and Fluorouracil (CF) Variant #01 | — | R 1 783 | 28d | 5.4 mo | 11.1 mo | 3 | R 5 350 PFS proxy | 7 |
Cisplatin and Paclitaxel (TP) and Toripalimab Variant #02 Partial | — | R 1 748 | 21d | — | 17.0 mo | 7 | R 10 490 PFS proxy | 1 |
Cisplatin and Paclitaxel (TP) and Tislelizumab Variant #01 Partial | — | R 1 748 | 21d | — | 17.2 mo | 2 | R 3 497 PFS proxy | — |
Cisplatin and Paclitaxel (TP) and Camrelizumab Variant #02 Partial | — | R 1 748 | 21d | 6.9 mo | 15.5 mo | 7 | R 10 490 PFS proxy | 3 |
FUOX Variant #01 | — | R 1 629 | 14d | — | 10.6 mo | 18 | R 29 321 PFS proxy | — |
Capecitabine and Cisplatin (CX) and Tislelizumab Variant #01 Partial | — | R 1 480 | 21d | — | 17.2 mo | 2 | R 2 960 PFS proxy | — |
Capecitabine and Cisplatin (CX) Variant #01 | — | R 1 480 | 21d | — | 10.6 mo | 6 | R 8 879 PFS proxy | — |
Cisplatin and Paclitaxel (TP) Variant #02 | — | R 1 315 | 21d | 5.6 mo | 11.1 mo | 7 | R 9 204 PFS proxy | 5 |
Etoposide monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 1 231 | 28d | — | — | ~6 | ~R 7 386 indirect | — |
Cisplatin and Fluorouracil (CF) and Nivolumab Variant #01 Partial | — | R 1 048 | 28d | — | 13.2 mo | 27 | R 28 292 PFS proxy | 1 |
Cisplatin and Fluorouracil (CF) and Sintilimab Variant #01 Partial | — | R 1 048 | 28d | — | 17.2 mo | 26 | R 6 287 PFS proxy | 1 |
Cisplatin and Fluorouracil (CF) and Tislelizumab Variant #01 Partial | — | R 1 048 | 21d | — | 17.2 mo | 2 | R 2 096 PFS proxy | — |
Cisplatin and Fluorouracil (CF) and Sugemalimab Variant #01 Partial | — | R 927 | 21d | 6.2 mo | 15.3 mo | 35 | R 5 559 PFS proxy | 2 |
Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin (CapeOx) and Tislelizumab Partial | — | — | — | — | 17.2 mo | — | — | — |
25 of 25 regimens shown