Endometrial cancer · 30 regimens
Cost vs Efficacy · 22 points
| Regimen | Biomarker | Cost/cycle ↓ | Cycle | PFS ↕ | OS ↕ | Est. cycles | Course cost ↕ | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Carboplatin and Paclitaxel (CP), Olaparib, Durvalumab Variant #01 | — | R 291 906 | 28d | 15.1 mo | — | 6 | R 987 739 PFS proxy | 1 |
Pembrolizumab monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 286 955 | 14d | ~5.8 mo | ~15.5 mo | ~52 | ~R 14 921 674 PFS proxy · indirect | 40 |
Carboplatin and Paclitaxel (CP) and Durvalumab Variant #03 | — | R 232 682 | 28d | 10.2 mo | — | 6 | R 869 291 PFS proxy | 1 |
Lenvatinib and Pembrolizumab Variant #01 | — | R 128 546 | 21d | — | 18.3 mo | 36 | R 4 545 663 PFS proxy | 1 |
Carboplatin and Paclitaxel (CP) and Pembrolizumab Variant #01 | — | R 84 794 | 21d | 13.1 mo | — | 35 | R 2 886 392 PFS proxy | 2 |
Carboplatin and Paclitaxel (CP) and Trastuzumab Variant #03 | — | R 40 931 | 28d | 12.9 mo | — | 6 | R 133 118 PFS proxy | 1 |
Carboplatin and Paclitaxel (CP) and Atezolizumab Variant #01 | — | R 33 899 | 21d | 10.1 mo | — | 9 | R 302 450 PFS proxy | 1 |
Carboplatin and Paclitaxel (CP), Bevacizumab, Cadonilimab Variant #01 Partial | — | R 32 363 | 21d | 12.7 mo | — | 7 | R 224 167 PFS proxy | 2 |
Carboplatin and Paclitaxel (CP) and Bevacizumab Variant #01 | — | R 32 363 | 28d | 8.1 mo | 22.8 mo | 7 | R 224 167 PFS proxy | 2 |
Cisplatin and Paclitaxel (TP), Bevacizumab, Cadonilimab Variant #01 Partial | — | R 31 587 | 21d | 12.7 mo | — | 7 | R 219 511 PFS proxy | 2 |
Cisplatin and Paclitaxel (TP) and Bevacizumab Variant #01 | — | R 31 301 | 21d | 8.1 mo | 22.8 mo | 2 | R 62 602 PFS proxy | 2 |
Bevacizumab monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 19 082 | 14d | ~20.4 mo | ~51.6 mo | ~52 | ~R 992 271 PFS proxy · indirect | 3 |
Topotecan monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 18 138 | 21d | ~4.6 mo | ~12.7 mo | ~4 | ~R 72 553 PFS proxy · indirect | 13 |
Cisplatin and Ifosfamide Variant #01 | — | R 13 954 | 21d | 6.0 mo | — | 3 | R 41 861 PFS proxy | 1 |
Carboplatin and Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin Variant #03 | — | R 13 338 | 28d | ~10.7 mo | ~21.4 mo | ~6 | ~R 80 026 PFS proxy · indirect | 5 |
Dactinomycin monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 11 858 | 28d | — | — | ~2 | ~R 23 716 indirect | — |
Ifosfamide and Paclitaxel Variant #01 | — | R 9 725 | 21d | — | 21.3 mo | 10 | R 97 251 PFS proxy | 2 |
Ifosfamide monotherapy Variant #05 | — | R 8 704 | 21d | 4.0 mo | 8.4 mo | 8 | R 69 635 PFS proxy | 2 |
Carboplatin and Paclitaxel (CP) and Dostarlimab Variant #01 Partial | — | R 2 645 | 42d | — | 44.6 mo | 26 | R 15 869 PFS proxy | 2 |
Carboplatin and Paclitaxel (CP) and Cadonilimab Variant #01 Partial | — | R 2 377 | 21d | 12.7 mo | — | 7 | R 14 264 PFS proxy | 2 |
Cisplatin, Doxorubicin, Paclitaxel Variant #01 | — | R 1 986 | 21d | — | 28.2 mo | 7 | R 13 902 PFS proxy | 2 |
Cisplatin and Paclitaxel (TP) and Cadonilimab Variant #01 Partial | — | R 1 601 | 21d | 12.7 mo | — | 7 | R 9 607 PFS proxy | 2 |
Cisplatin and Doxorubicin Variant #01 | — | R 1 434 | 21d | 5.7 mo | 12.3 mo | 3 | R 4 301 PFS proxy | 2 |
Cisplatin and Paclitaxel (TP) Variant #02 | — | R 1 315 | 21d | 8.1 mo | 22.8 mo | 7 | R 9 204 PFS proxy | 2 |
Carboplatin and Paclitaxel (CP) Variant #02 | — | R 1 025 | 21d | 8.8 mo | 29.4 mo | 9 | R 9 222 PFS proxy | 11 |
Doxorubicin monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 902 | 21d | 3.8 mo | 9.2 mo | 9 | R 8 114 PFS proxy | 2 |
Paclitaxel monotherapy Variant #02 | — | R 734 | 28d | — | 11.9 mo | 7 | R 5 141 PFS proxy | 2 |
Carboplatin monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 535 | 21d | ~5.8 mo | ~21.0 mo | ~2 | ~R 1 070 PFS proxy · indirect | 7 |
Temsirolimus monotherapy Variant #02 Partial | — | — | 28d | ~4.8 mo | ~17.2 mo | ~2 | — | 3 |
Dostarlimab monotherapy Variant #01 Partial | — | — | 42d | — | — | ~2 | — | — |
30 of 30 regimens shown