Classical Hodgkin lymphoma · 37 regimens
Cost vs Efficacy · 6 points
| Regimen | Biomarker | Cost/cycle ↓ | Cycle | PFS ↕ | OS ↕ | Est. cycles | Course cost ↕ | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
O-ESHAP Variant #01 | — | R 1 540 696 | 28d | — | — | ~3 | ~R 2 060 430 indirect | — |
Bendamustine and Brentuximab vedotin Variant #01 | — | R 91 442 | 21d | — | — | ~6 | ~R 548 654 indirect | — |
Brentuximab vedotin and Nivolumab Variant #01 Partial | — | R 85 244 | 21d | — | — | ~4 | ~R 340 976 indirect | — |
Brentuximab vedotin monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 56 829 | 21d | 8.3 mo | — | 17 | R 966 097 PFS proxy | 1 |
GCD-R Variant #01 | — | R 30 934 | 21d | — | — | ~4 | ~R 123 735 indirect | — |
Gemcitabine and Rituximab Variant #01 | — | R 30 921 | 28d | — | ~9.5 mo | ~6 | ~R 185 526 PFS proxy · indirect | 1 |
Ifosfamide and Vinorelbine Variant #01 | — | R 25 896 | 21d | — | — | ~2 | ~R 51 792 indirect | — |
IGEV Variant #01 | — | R 21 643 | 21d | — | — | ~4 | ~R 86 572 indirect | — |
GVD Variant #01 | — | R 20 259 | 21d | — | — | ~6 | ~R 121 555 indirect | — |
Everolimus monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 18 360 | 28d | ~6.0 mo | ~18.1 mo | ~2 | ~R 36 719 PFS proxy · indirect | 15 |
MINE Variant #02 | — | R 12 872 | 21d | — | — | ~7 | ~R 90 104 indirect | — |
ICE Variant #05 | — | R 12 735 | — | — | ~13.9 mo | ~4 | ~R 50 942 PFS proxy · indirect | — |
BeGEV Variant #01 | — | R 10 021 | 21d | — | — | ~4 | ~R 40 085 indirect | — |
Bendamustine monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 7 084 | — | ~16.5 mo | — | ~8 | ~R 56 672 PFS proxy · indirect | 2 |
DexaBEAM Variant #01 Partial | — | R 5 829 | 28d | — | — | ~2 | ~R 11 659 indirect | — |
GCD Variant #01 | — | R 5 029 | 21d | — | — | ~4 | ~R 20 117 indirect | — |
GVP Variant #01 | — | R 4 285 | 28d | — | — | ~4 | ~R 17 142 indirect | — |
DHAP - time intensified Variant #01 | — | R 4 040 | — | — | — | ~2 | ~R 8 080 indirect | — |
ESHAP Variant #01 | — | R 3 886 | 21d | — | — | ~8 | ~R 31 091 indirect | — |
eBEACOPP (Prednisolone) Variant #01 Partial | — | R 3 549 | 21d | — | — | ~3 | ~R 10 646 indirect | — |
eBEACOPP Variant #01 Partial | — | R 3 523 | 21d | — | — | ~8 | ~R 28 186 PFS proxy · indirect | 2 |
ABVD Variant #01 Partial | — | R 2 885 | 28d | — | — | ~2 | ~R 5 770 PFS proxy · indirect | 4 |
DHAP Variant #01 | — | R 2 495 | 28d | — | — | ~2 | ~R 4 991 indirect | — |
Mini-BEAM Variant #01 Partial | — | R 2 430 | 28d | — | — | ~2 | ~R 4 859 indirect | — |
Lenalidomide monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 2 178 | 28d | ~8.7 mo | — | ~24 | ~R 52 272 PFS proxy · indirect | 3 |
BEACOPP-14 (Prednisolone) Variant #01 Partial | — | R 2 055 | 14d | — | — | ~6 | ~R 12 329 indirect | — |
BEACOPP Variant #01 Partial | — | R 2 042 | 21d | — | — | ~4 | ~R 8 167 indirect | — |
Gemcitabine monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 1 672 | 21d | ~5.2 mo | — | ~7 | ~R 11 705 PFS proxy · indirect | 1 |
Vinblastine monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 1 444 | 14d | — | — | ~2 | ~R 2 888 indirect | — |
Vinorelbine monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 458 | 21d | ~4.0 mo | ~9.4 mo | ~12 | ~R 5 490 PFS proxy · indirect | 26 |
Rituximab monotherapy Variant #09 Partial | — | — | 28d | ~5.2 mo | — | ~1 | — | 3 |
Tislelizumab monotherapy Variant #01 Partial | — | — | 21d | — | ~16.0 mo | ~2 | — | 3 |
Sintilimab monotherapy Variant #01 Partial | — | — | 14d | — | ~11.8 mo | ~2 | — | 1 |
Nivolumab monotherapy Variant #01 Partial | — | — | 14d | ~4.6 mo | ~12.2 mo | ~2 | — | 28 |
Zimberelimab monotherapy Variant #01 Partial | — | — | 14d | — | — | ~52 | — | — |
Penpulimab monotherapy Variant #01 Partial | — | — | 14d | — | — | ~2 | — | — |
Camrelizumab monotherapy Variant #01 Partial | — | — | 14d | — | ~8.0 mo | ~2 | — | 1 |
37 of 37 regimens shown