Chronic myeloid leukemia · 17 regimens
Cost vs Efficacy · 1 point
| Regimen | Biomarker | Cost/cycle ↓ | Cycle | PFS ↕ | OS ↕ | Est. cycles | Course cost ↕ | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Asciminib monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 199 106 | 28d | — | — | ~2 | ~R 398 211 indirect | — |
Nilotinib monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 28 002 | 28d | — | — | ~2 | ~R 56 004 indirect | — |
Dasatinib monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 12 899 | 28d | — | — | ~2 | ~R 25 797 indirect | — |
Busulfan monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 9 802 | 28d | — | — | ~2 | ~R 19 604 indirect | — |
Imatinib and LoDAC Variant #01 | — | R 6 227 | 28d | — | — | ~14 | ~R 87 179 indirect | — |
Imatinib monotherapy Variant #16 | — | R 1 401 | 28d | ~20.0 mo | ~53.0 mo | ~2 | ~R 2 801 PFS proxy · indirect | 8 |
Imatinib and Interferon alfa Variant #01 Partial | — | R 1 401 | 7d | — | — | ~8 | ~R 11 206 indirect | — |
Imatinib and Peginterferon alfa-2a Variant #01 Partial | — | R 1 401 | 7d | — | — | ~2 | ~R 2 801 indirect | — |
Hydroxyurea and Interferon alfa-2a Variant #01 Partial | — | R 741 | 28d | — | — | ~2 | ~R 1 481 indirect | — |
Cytarabine and Interferon alfa-2b Variant #01 Partial | — | R 446 | 30d | — | — | 2 | R 892 PFS proxy | 1 |
Hydroxyurea monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 265 | 28d | — | ~243.6 mo | ~2 | ~R 529 PFS proxy · indirect | — |
Interferon alfa-2a monotherapy Variant #01 Partial | — | — | 7d | ~5.4 mo | ~17.5 mo | ~2 | — | 10 |
Interferon alfa-2b monotherapy Variant #01 Partial | — | — | 28d | — | — | 48 | — | 1 |
Radotinib monotherapy Variant #01 Partial | — | — | 28d | — | — | ~2 | — | — |
Interferon alfa-n1 monotherapy Variant #01 Partial | — | — | 21d | — | — | ~2 | — | — |
Interferon alfa monotherapy Variant #01 Partial | — | — | 7d | — | — | ~2 | — | — |
Bosutinib monotherapy Variant #01 Partial | — | — | 28d | — | — | ~2 | — | — |
17 of 17 regimens shown