Cholangiocarcinoma · 16 regimens
Cost vs Efficacy · 6 points
| Regimen | Biomarker | Cost/cycle ↓ | Cycle | PFS ↕ | OS ↕ | Est. cycles | Course cost ↕ | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pembrolizumab monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 286 955 | 14d | ~16.5 mo | ~13.9 mo | ~36 | ~R 10 330 390 PFS proxy · indirect | 7 |
Erlotinib and Bevacizumab Variant #01 | — | R 52 071 | 28d | ~16.4 mo | ~49.1 mo | ~18 | ~R 937 282 PFS proxy · indirect | 7 |
GEMOX-B Variant #01 | — | R 42 835 | 28d | — | — | — | — | — |
Cisplatin and Gemcitabine (GC) Variant #34 | — | R 15 338 | 56d | — | ~11.1 mo | — | — | 8 |
Gemcitabine monotherapy Variant #20 | — | R 14 213 | 56d | ~4.7 mo | ~6.8 mo | ~3 | ~R 42 639 PFS proxy · indirect | 31 |
Gemcitabine and Mitomycin Variant #01 | — | R 7 409 | 28d | — | — | — | — | — |
FULV and Gemcitabine Variant #02 | — | R 3 219 | 21d | — | — | — | — | — |
Gemcitabine and S-1 Variant #01 Partial | — | R 2 843 | 21d | — | ~26.1 mo | — | — | 2 |
Capecitabine and Mitomycin Variant #01 | — | R 2 711 | 28d | — | — | — | — | — |
GemOx Variant #01 | — | R 2 335 | 14d | ~5.0 mo | ~9.0 mo | ~11 | ~R 25 688 PFS proxy · indirect | 5 |
Capecitabine monotherapy Variant #17 | — | R 2 219 | 21d | ~5.7 mo | ~7.5 mo | ~9 | ~R 19 974 PFS proxy · indirect | 11 |
FELV Variant #01 | — | R 1 934 | 21d | — | ~12.0 mo | — | — | — |
Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, S-1 Variant #01 Partial | — | R 1 546 | 14d | — | ~13.5 mo | — | — | 1 |
FULV Variant #01 | — | R 1 466 | 35d | ~5.6 mo | ~13.1 mo | ~5 | ~R 7 330 PFS proxy · indirect | 15 |
Nivolumab monotherapy Variant #01 Partial | — | — | 14d | ~1.8 mo | ~10.9 mo | ~4 | — | 6 |
Pemigatinib monotherapy Variant #01 Partial | — | — | 21d | — | — | — | — | — |
16 of 16 regimens shown