Cervical cancer · 24 regimens
Cost vs Efficacy · 10 points
| Regimen | Biomarker | Cost/cycle ↓ | Cycle | PFS ↕ | OS ↕ | Est. cycles | Course cost ↕ | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Carboplatin and Paclitaxel (CP), Bevacizumab, Pembrolizumab Variant #01 | — | R 114 618 | 21d | — | 26.4 mo | 36 | R 3 964 926 PFS proxy | 2 |
Cisplatin and Paclitaxel (TP), Bevacizumab, Pembrolizumab Variant #01 | — | R 113 575 | 21d | — | 26.4 mo | 36 | R 3 958 664 PFS proxy | 2 |
Carboplatin and Paclitaxel (CP) and Pembrolizumab Variant #01 | — | R 84 794 | 21d | — | 26.4 mo | 35 | R 2 886 392 PFS proxy | 2 |
Cisplatin and Paclitaxel (TP) and Pembrolizumab Variant #01 | — | R 83 588 | 21d | — | 26.4 mo | 35 | R 2 879 160 PFS proxy | 2 |
ABCP Variant #05 | — | R 63 886 | 21d | 13.7 mo | 32.1 mo | 7 | R 444 555 PFS proxy | 2 |
Cisplatin and Paclitaxel (TP), Atezolizumab, Bevacizumab Variant #01 | — | R 62 842 | 21d | 13.7 mo | 32.1 mo | 2 | R 125 684 PFS proxy | 2 |
Paclitaxel, Topotecan, Bevacizumab Variant #01 | — | R 42 176 | 21d | — | — | ~2 | ~R 84 353 indirect | — |
Carboplatin and Paclitaxel (CP) and Bevacizumab Variant #01 | — | R 32 363 | 28d | 10.4 mo | 19.8 mo | 7 | R 224 167 PFS proxy | 3 |
Cisplatin and Paclitaxel (TP) and Bevacizumab Variant #01 | — | R 31 301 | 21d | 10.4 mo | 16.8 mo | 2 | R 62 602 PFS proxy | 4 |
Topotecan monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 18 138 | 21d | — | ~9.0 mo | ~4 | ~R 72 553 PFS proxy · indirect | 2 |
Cisplatin and Ifosfamide Variant #01 | — | R 13 954 | 21d | ~6.0 mo | ~48.0 mo | ~8 | ~R 111 628 PFS proxy · indirect | 2 |
Paclitaxel and Topotecan Variant #01 | — | R 12 190 | 21d | — | 9.6 mo | 2 | R 24 380 PFS proxy | — |
Cisplatin and Topotecan Variant #01 | — | R 11 177 | 21d | 6.0 mo | 10.3 mo | 6 | R 67 063 PFS proxy | 1 |
Ifosfamide monotherapy Variant #05 | — | R 8 704 | 21d | ~4.0 mo | ~8.4 mo | ~8 | ~R 69 635 PFS proxy · indirect | 2 |
Carboplatin and Docetaxel (DCb) Variant #06 | — | R 5 501 | 21d | ~4.7 mo | ~22.3 mo | ~6 | ~R 33 004 PFS proxy · indirect | 4 |
Cisplatin and Gemcitabine (GC) Variant #01 | — | R 3 933 | 21d | — | 10.3 mo | 6 | R 23 595 PFS proxy | 1 |
Cisplatin and Vinorelbine (CVb) Variant #01 | — | R 2 418 | 21d | — | 10.0 mo | 6 | R 14 510 PFS proxy | 1 |
Cisplatin and Mitomycin Variant #01 | — | R 1 656 | 28d | — | — | ~9 | ~R 14 902 indirect | — |
Cisplatin and Paclitaxel (TP) Variant #02 | — | R 1 315 | 21d | — | 12.9 mo | 7 | R 9 204 PFS proxy | 5 |
Carboplatin and Paclitaxel (CP) Variant #02 | — | R 1 025 | 21d | — | 17.2 mo | 18 | R 18 445 PFS proxy | 4 |
Paclitaxel monotherapy Variant #02 | — | R 734 | 28d | ~4.7 mo | ~13.1 mo | ~7 | ~R 5 141 PFS proxy · indirect | 22 |
Cisplatin monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 588 | 21d | — | 19.5 mo | 2 | R 1 177 PFS proxy | 1 |
Carboplatin monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 535 | 21d | ~5.8 mo | ~21.0 mo | ~2 | ~R 1 070 PFS proxy · indirect | 7 |
Vinorelbine monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 458 | 21d | — | ~9.0 mo | ~12 | ~R 5 490 PFS proxy · indirect | 2 |
24 of 24 regimens shown