Cervical cancer · 12 regimens
Cost vs Efficacy · 4 points
| Regimen | Biomarker | Cost/cycle ↓ | Cycle | PFS ↕ | OS ↕ | Est. cycles | Course cost ↕ | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pembrolizumab monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 286 955 | 14d | ~5.8 mo | ~15.5 mo | ~2 | ~R 573 911 PFS proxy · indirect | 40 |
Bevacizumab monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 19 082 | 14d | ~20.4 mo | ~51.6 mo | ~52 | ~R 992 271 PFS proxy · indirect | 3 |
Topotecan monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 18 138 | 21d | — | 9.0 mo | 11 | R 199 522 PFS proxy | 2 |
Pemetrexed monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 13 225 | 21d | — | 9.0 mo | 4 | R 52 900 PFS proxy | 2 |
Cisplatin and Gemcitabine (GC) Variant #01 | — | R 3 933 | 21d | — | ~10.3 mo | ~6 | ~R 23 595 PFS proxy · indirect | 1 |
FULV Variant #29 | — | R 3 601 | 14d | ~5.6 mo | ~13.1 mo | ~2 | ~R 7 201 PFS proxy · indirect | 15 |
Docetaxel monotherapy Variant #02 | — | R 2 921 | 28d | ~3.2 mo | ~9.5 mo | ~9 | ~R 26 293 PFS proxy · indirect | 83 |
Irinotecan monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 2 716 | 42d | — | 9.0 mo | 11 | R 29 874 PFS proxy | 2 |
Gemcitabine monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 1 672 | 21d | — | 9.0 mo | 7 | R 11 705 PFS proxy | 2 |
Vinorelbine monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 458 | 21d | — | 9.0 mo | 12 | R 5 490 PFS proxy | 2 |
Cemiplimab monotherapy Variant #01 Partial | — | — | 21d | — | 11.9 mo | 48 | — | 2 |
Tisotumab vedotin monotherapy Variant #01 Partial | — | — | 21d | — | 11.5 mo | 2 | — | 1 |
12 of 12 regimens shown