Cervical cancer · 12 regimens
Cost vs Efficacy · 4 points
| Regimen | Biomarker | Cost/cycle ↓ | Cycle | PFS ↕ | OS ↕ | Est. cycles | Course cost ↕ | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pembrolizumab monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 286 955 | 14d | ~5.8 mo | ~15.5 mo | ~13 | ~R 3 730 419 PFS proxy · indirect | 40 |
Bevacizumab monotherapy Variant #08 | — | R 57 246 | 21d | ~20.4 mo | ~51.6 mo | ~30 | ~R 1 717 393 PFS proxy · indirect | 3 |
Cisplatin and Gemcitabine (GC) Variant #34 | — | R 15 338 | 56d | — | ~10.3 mo | — | — | 1 |
Gemcitabine monotherapy Variant #20 | — | R 14 213 | 56d | — | 9.0 mo | — | — | 2 |
Topotecan monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 11 563 | 21d | — | 9.0 mo | — | — | 2 |
FULV Variant #01 | — | R 1 466 | 35d | ~5.6 mo | ~13.1 mo | ~5 | ~R 7 330 PFS proxy · indirect | 15 |
Vinorelbine monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 583 | 21d | — | 9.0 mo | — | — | 2 |
Docetaxel monotherapy N/A - secondary systemic drug | — | R 243 | 28d | ~3.2 mo | ~9.5 mo | ~4 | ~R 973 PFS proxy · indirect | 83 |
Pemetrexed monotherapy N/A - secondary systemic drug | — | R 69 | 21d | — | 9.0 mo | — | — | 2 |
Irinotecan monotherapy N/A - secondary systemic drug | — | R 47 | 42d | — | 9.0 mo | — | — | 2 |
Cemiplimab monotherapy Variant #01 Partial | — | — | 21d | — | 11.9 mo | — | — | 2 |
Tisotumab vedotin monotherapy Variant #01 Partial | — | — | 21d | — | 11.5 mo | — | — | 1 |
12 of 12 regimens shown