Breast cancer · 34 regimens
Cost vs Efficacy · 24 points
| Regimen | Biomarker | Cost/cycle ↓ | Cycle | PFS ↕ | OS ↕ | Est. cycles | Course cost ↕ | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fulvestrant and Ribociclib Variant #01 | ER | R 37 135 | 28d | 20.5 mo | 60.7 mo | 23 | R 854 110 PFS proxy | 3 |
Abemaciclib and Fulvestrant Variant #01 | ER | R 32 245 | 28d | 11.4 mo | 46.7 mo | 13 | R 419 183 PFS proxy | 4 |
Fulvestrant and Palbociclib Variant #01 | ER | R 26 181 | 28d | 10.6 mo | 34.8 mo | 12 | R 314 169 PFS proxy | 3 |
Eribulin monotherapy Variant #01 | ER | R 24 243 | 21d | 4.1 mo | 13.1 mo | 6 | R 145 460 PFS proxy | 21 |
Eribulin monotherapy Variant #01 | TNBC | R 24 243 | 21d | 4.1 mo | 13.1 mo | 6 | R 145 460 PFS proxy | 21 |
Abemaciclib monotherapy Variant #01 | ER | R 21 226 | 28d | — | — | — | — | — |
Everolimus and Exemestane Variant #01 | ER | R 19 245 | 28d | 7.8 mo | 31.0 mo | 9 | R 173 206 PFS proxy | 2 |
Everolimus and Tamoxifen Variant #01 | ER | R 18 496 | 28d | — | — | — | — | 1 |
Capivasertib and Fulvestrant Variant #01 Partial | ER | R 16 325 | 28d | 7.3 mo | — | 8 | R 130 601 PFS proxy | 2 |
Capecitabine and Ixabepilone Variant #01 | TNBC | R 15 711 | 21d | 5.8 mo | 16.4 mo | 9 | R 141 400 PFS proxy | 4 |
Enzalutamide monotherapy Variant #01 | TNBC | R 14 528 | 28d | ~4.2 mo | ~17.5 mo | ~5 | ~R 72 642 PFS proxy · indirect | 13 |
Gemcitabine monotherapy Variant #20 | TNBC | R 14 213 | 56d | 4.6 mo | 11.2 mo | 3 | R 42 639 PFS proxy | 15 |
Gemcitabine monotherapy Variant #20 | ER | R 14 213 | 56d | 4.6 mo | 11.2 mo | 3 | R 42 639 PFS proxy | 15 |
Capecitabine and Fulvestrant Variant #01 | ER | R 11 464 | 28d | — | — | — | — | — |
Anastrozole and Fulvestrant Variant #01 | ER | R 11 043 | 28d | 4.4 mo | — | 5 | R 55 213 PFS proxy | 1 |
Fulvestrant monotherapy Variant #03 | ER | R 10 883 | 28d | 5.5 mo | 30.4 mo | 6 | R 65 301 PFS proxy | 31 |
Exemestane and Palbociclib Variant #01 | ER | R 10 741 | 28d | 5.7 mo | — | 7 | R 75 187 PFS proxy | 1 |
Letrozole and Palbociclib Variant #01 | ER | R 10 226 | 28d | 5.7 mo | — | 7 | R 71 585 PFS proxy | 1 |
Anastrozole and Palbociclib Variant #01 | ER | R 10 015 | 28d | 5.7 mo | — | 7 | R 70 103 PFS proxy | 1 |
Mitomycin and Vinblastine (MV) Variant #02 | — | R 7 939 | 56d | 2.5 mo | 8.7 mo | 2 | R 15 878 PFS proxy | 1 |
Carboplatin and Gemcitabine (GCb) Variant #01 | TNBC | R 3 663 | 21d | 4.1 mo | — | 6 | R 21 978 PFS proxy | 1 |
Exemestane monotherapy Variant #01 | ER | R 2 846 | 90d | 3.6 mo | — | 2 | R 5 693 PFS proxy | 7 |
Capecitabine monotherapy Variant #17 | ER | R 2 219 | 21d | 4.5 mo | 15.6 mo | 7 | R 15 535 PFS proxy | 33 |
Capecitabine monotherapy Variant #17 | TNBC | R 2 219 | 21d | 4.5 mo | 15.6 mo | 7 | R 15 535 PFS proxy | 33 |
Exemestane and Tucidinostat Variant #01 Partial | ER | R 886 | 28d | 7.4 mo | — | 9 | R 7 970 PFS proxy | 1 |
Vinorelbine monotherapy Variant #01 | TNBC | R 583 | 21d | 4.0 mo | 10.8 mo | 6 | R 3 500 PFS proxy | 17 |
Vinorelbine monotherapy Variant #01 | ER | R 583 | 21d | 4.0 mo | 10.8 mo | 6 | R 3 500 PFS proxy | 17 |
Tamoxifen monotherapy Variant #06 | ER | R 410 | 28d | — | 32.9 mo | — | — | 1 |
Letrozole monotherapy Variant #01 | ER | R 371 | 28d | — | — | — | — | 1 |
Anastrozole monotherapy Variant #01 | ER | R 159 | 28d | — | — | — | — | 1 |
Fluoxymesterone and Tamoxifen Variant #01 Partial | ER | R 137 | 28d | — | — | — | — | — |
Elacestrant monotherapy Variant #01 Partial | ER | — | 28d | — | — | — | — | 1 |
Sacituzumab govitecan monotherapy Variant #01 Partial | ER | — | 21d | 5.2 mo | 13.2 mo | 8 | — | 8 |
Sacituzumab govitecan monotherapy Variant #01 Partial | TNBC | — | 21d | 5.2 mo | 13.2 mo | 8 | — | 8 |
34 of 34 regimens shown