Breast cancer · 30 regimens
Cost vs Efficacy · 10 points
| Regimen | Biomarker | Cost/cycle ↓ | Cycle | PFS ↕ | OS ↕ | Est. cycles | Course cost ↕ | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pembrolizumab monotherapy Variant #01 | TNBC | R 286 955 | 14d | ~5.8 mo | ~15.5 mo | ~2 | ~R 573 911 PFS proxy · indirect | 40 |
Bevacizumab monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 19 082 | 14d | ~4.3 mo | ~23.7 mo | ~2 | ~R 38 164 PFS proxy · indirect | 1 |
MMM Variant #01 | — | R 4 862 | 21d | — | — | ~6 | ~R 29 173 indirect | — |
Epirubicin monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 3 200 | 21d | — | — | 7 | R 22 400 PFS proxy | 1 |
Docetaxel monotherapy Variant #02 | — | R 2 921 | 28d | ~8.0 mo | ~11.5 mo | ~4 | ~R 11 686 PFS proxy · indirect | 11 |
TAC (Docetaxel) Variant #01 | — | R 2 905 | 21d | — | — | 6 | R 17 428 PFS proxy | 2 |
Epirubicin and Paclitaxel (EP) Variant #01 | — | R 2 715 | 21d | ~10.8 mo | ~22.4 mo | ~6 | ~R 16 290 PFS proxy · indirect | 2 |
Cyclophosphamide and Epirubicin (EC) Variant #01 | — | R 2 429 | 21d | ~8.0 mo | ~20.3 mo | ~8 | ~R 19 434 PFS proxy · indirect | 1 |
Cyclophosphamide and Docetaxel (TC) Variant #01 | — | R 2 423 | 21d | — | — | ~4 | ~R 9 690 indirect | — |
FEC Variant #01 | — | R 2 049 | 21d | — | — | 2 | R 4 097 PFS proxy | 7 |
Doxorubicin and Paclitaxel (AT) Variant #01 | — | R 1 609 | 21d | — | ~25.3 mo | ~9 | ~R 13 972 PFS proxy · indirect | 1 |
FAC Variant #11 | TNBC | R 1 076 | 21d | — | — | 9 | R 9 685 PFS proxy | 1 |
FAC Variant #11 | — | R 1 076 | 21d | — | — | 9 | R 9 685 PFS proxy | 1 |
Capecitabine monotherapy Variant #01 | TNBC | R 1 039 | 21d | — | — | 8 | R 8 309 PFS proxy | 2 |
Capecitabine monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 1 039 | 21d | — | — | 8 | R 8 309 PFS proxy | 2 |
Carboplatin and Paclitaxel (CP) Variant #02 | TNBC | R 1 025 | 21d | ~12.6 mo | ~28.2 mo | ~9 | ~R 9 222 PFS proxy · indirect | 2 |
CMFT Variant #01 | — | R 910 | 28d | — | — | ~2 | ~R 1 819 indirect | — |
Doxorubicin monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 902 | 21d | ~6.8 mo | ~13.8 mo | ~9 | ~R 8 114 PFS proxy · indirect | 3 |
Cyclophosphamide and Doxorubicin (AC) Variant #01 | — | R 864 | 21d | — | — | 6 | R 5 185 PFS proxy | 1 |
Cyclophosphamide and Doxorubicin (AC) Variant #01 | TNBC | R 864 | 21d | — | — | 6 | R 5 185 PFS proxy | 1 |
Dose-dense Cyclophosphamide and Doxorubicin (ddAC) Variant #01 | — | R 770 | 14d | — | — | 6 | R 4 621 PFS proxy | 1 |
Paclitaxel monotherapy Variant #02 | ERBB2 | R 734 | 28d | ~6.4 mo | ~16.8 mo | ~7 | ~R 5 141 PFS proxy · indirect | 28 |
Paclitaxel monotherapy Variant #02 | — | R 734 | 28d | ~6.4 mo | ~16.8 mo | ~7 | ~R 5 141 PFS proxy · indirect | 28 |
Vinorelbine monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 458 | 21d | ~4.0 mo | ~10.1 mo | ~12 | ~R 5 490 PFS proxy · indirect | 18 |
CMF Variant #01 | — | R 291 | 28d | — | — | 2 | R 582 PFS proxy | 4 |
CMF Variant #01 | TNBC | R 291 | 28d | — | — | 2 | R 582 PFS proxy | 4 |
Dose-dense Doxorubicin monotherapy Partial | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Dose-dense Cyclophosphamide monotherapy Partial | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Dose-dense Epirubicin monotherapy Partial | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Bevacizumab-containing therapy Partial | TNBC | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
30 of 30 regimens shown