Bladder cancer · 16 regimens
Cost vs Efficacy · 5 points
| Regimen | Biomarker | Cost/cycle ↓ | Cycle | PFS ↕ | OS ↕ | Est. cycles | Course cost ↕ | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pembrolizumab monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 286 955 | 14d | — | 10.0 mo | 52 | R 14 921 674 PFS proxy | 1 |
Enfortumab vedotin and Pembrolizumab Variant #01 Partial | — | R 81 987 | 21d | ~12.5 mo | ~32.7 mo | ~36 | ~R 2 869 553 PFS proxy · indirect | 4 |
Docetaxel and Ramucirumab Variant #01 | — | R 62 164 | 21d | 4.8 mo | — | 2 | R 124 328 PFS proxy | 1 |
nab-Paclitaxel monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 16 043 | 28d | ~5.5 mo | ~16.2 mo | ~2 | ~R 32 087 PFS proxy · indirect | 17 |
Pemetrexed monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 13 225 | 21d | ~3.0 mo | ~9.0 mo | ~4 | ~R 52 900 PFS proxy · indirect | 21 |
MVAC Variant #02 | — | R 5 442 | 28d | — | ~15.3 mo | ~2 | ~R 10 883 PFS proxy · indirect | 4 |
Gemcitabine and Paclitaxel Variant #01 | — | R 5 224 | 21d | — | 7.8 mo | 6 | R 31 344 PFS proxy | — |
Docetaxel monotherapy Variant #02 | — | R 2 921 | 28d | 2.8 mo | 8.9 mo | 8 | R 23 372 PFS proxy | 6 |
Gemcitabine monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 1 672 | 21d | — | — | ~7 | ~R 11 705 PFS proxy · indirect | 1 |
Paclitaxel monotherapy Variant #02 | — | R 734 | 28d | — | 8.9 mo | 7 | R 5 141 PFS proxy | 4 |
Avelumab monotherapy Variant #01 Partial | — | — | 14d | — | ~22.6 mo | ~2 | — | 2 |
Erdafitinib monotherapy Variant #01 Partial | — | — | 28d | — | — | ~2 | — | — |
Toripalimab monotherapy Variant #01 Partial | — | — | 14d | — | — | ~11 | — | — |
Vinflunine monotherapy Variant #01 Partial | — | — | 21d | — | 8.0 mo | 2 | — | 4 |
Tislelizumab monotherapy Variant #01 Partial | — | — | 21d | — | ~16.0 mo | ~2 | — | 3 |
Nivolumab monotherapy Variant #01 Partial | — | — | 14d | — | ~72.3 mo | ~2 | — | 2 |
16 of 16 regimens shown