Acute myeloid leukemia · 16 regimens
Cost vs Efficacy · 1 point
| Regimen | Biomarker | Cost/cycle ↓ | Cycle | PFS ↕ | OS ↕ | Est. cycles | Course cost ↕ | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LoDAC and Venetoclax Variant #01 | — | R 283 570 | 28d | — | 8.4 mo | — | — | 1 |
Azacitidine and Venetoclax Variant #01 | — | R 199 828 | 28d | — | 14.1 mo | — | — | 3 |
Decitabine and Venetoclax Variant #01 | — | R 192 740 | 28d | — | — | — | — | — |
Gemtuzumab ozogamicin monotherapy Variant #04 | — | R 122 454 | 8d | — | 4.9 mo | — | — | 1 |
Azacitidine and Gemtuzumab ozogamicin Variant #01 | — | R 59 517 | 8d | — | — | — | — | — |
FLAG Variant #01 | — | R 21 352 | — | — | ~6.7 mo | — | — | 1 |
Azacitidine monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 18 699 | 28d | — | 9.8 mo | — | — | 7 |
Cytarabine and Etoposide (CYVE) Variant #06 | NPM1 | R 11 761 | — | — | 9.2 mo | — | — | — |
Decitabine monotherapy Variant #01 | — | R 10 907 | 42d | — | 7.7 mo | — | — | 2 |
Temozolomide monotherapy Variant #13 | — | R 8 153 | 28d | ~4.0 mo | ~16.3 mo | ~5 | ~R 40 764 PFS proxy · indirect | 10 |
Glasdegib and LoDAC Variant #01 Partial | — | R 172 | 28d | — | 8.3 mo | — | — | 1 |
Low-dose Cytarabine monotherapy (LoDAC) Variant #01 | — | R 172 | 28d | — | 5.1 mo | — | — | 7 |
Clofarabine and LoDAC Variant #01 Partial | — | R 121 | 49d | — | — | — | — | — |
Best supportive care Partial | — | — | — | — | 5.8 mo | — | — | 5 |
Clofarabine monotherapy Variant #01 Partial | — | — | 42d | — | — | — | — | 1 |
CPX-351 monotherapy Variant #01 Partial | — | — | 49d | — | 9.3 mo | — | — | 1 |
16 of 16 regimens shown